Days to Remember: The British Empire in the Great War — Reading Companion
Edition facts
This digital edition of Days to Remember: The British Empire in the Great War — Reading Companion is described by source-level measurements including 55,482 words, 4 hr 2 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 21.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “World War, 1914-1918,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
I. THE CAUSES OF THE WAR II. A BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF THE WAR III. THE TURN AT THE MARNE
IV. THE WORCESTERS AT THE FIRST BATTLE OF YPRES V. THE CANADIANS AT THE SECOND BATTLE OF YPRES VI. THE TAKING OF LOOS VII. DELVILLE WOOD VIII. THE THIRD BATTLE OF YPRES IX. THE TANKS AT CAMBRAI X. THE SOUTH AFRICANS AT MARRIÈRES WOOD XI. THE BATTLE OF THE LYS XII. THE SECOND BATTLE OF THE MARNE XIII. THE BEGINNING OF THE END XIV. THE AUSTRALIANS AT MONT ST. QUENTIN XV. THE LAST BATTLE
XVI. THE LANDING AT GALLIPOLI XVII. THE LANDING AT GALLIPOLI (continued) XVIII. THE DEPARTURE FROM GALLIPOLI XIX. THE CAPTURE OF JERUSALEM XX. ALLENBY’S GREAT DRIVE
XXI. THE SILENT SERVICE XXII. CORONEL XXIII. THE FALKLANDS XXIV. MYSTERY SHIPS XXV. JUTLAND XXVI. THE BRITISH SUBMARINE SERVICE XXVII. THE BRITISH SUBMARINE SERVICE (continued) XXVIII. THE MERCANTILE MARINE AND FISHING FLEETS XXIX. ZEEBRUGGE
XXX. BEHIND THE LINES AND AT HOME
XXXI. THE LAST DAY XXXII. LOOKING BACKWARD
*LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS*
Field-Marshal Sir John French (Earl of Ypres)
Field-Marshal Sir Douglas Haig (Earl Haig of Bemersyde)
Field-Marshal Sir Edmund Allenby (Viscount Allenby of Megiddo)
Admiral Sir John Jellicoe (Viscount Jellicoe of Scapa)
Admiral Sir David Beatty (Earl Beatty of the North Sea)
Field-Marshal Earl Kitchener
The Critical Day in the First Battle of Ypres
The Second Battle of Ypres
Battle of Loos: Advance to Loos and Hill 70
Battle of the Somme: Longueval and Delville Wood
Cambrai: the Advance of the Infantry Divisions
The Second Battle of the Marne.
First Stages of the last Allied Offensive
The Landing Beaches at Gallipoli
Evacuation of the Gallipoli Peninsula
Palestine: the Decisive Battle
Battle of the Falkland Islands—First Phase
Battle of the Falkland Islands—Second Phase
Battle of the Falkland Islands—Last Phase
Battle of Jutland: Track Chart
The Front on the Eve of the Allied Offensive, and on the Day of the Armistice
*THE CAUSES OF THE WAR.*
It is never easy to fix upon one cause as the origin of a great war, and the war of 1914 was the outcome of several causes combined. For twenty years there had been growing up in Europe a sense of insecurity; the great Powers had become restless and suspicious of one another, and one Power, Germany, was seriously considering the possibility of some bold stroke which would put her beyond the reach of rivalry. Germany, since her victory over France in 1870, had become a very great and rich nation; she had spread her commerce over the world; and she was anxious to create an empire akin to those of Britain and France. But she began the task too late in the day; she could succeed only at the expense of her neighbours. The ambition of Germany was, therefore, one perpetual source of danger.
Another danger was her nervousness, which frequently accompanies ambition. There was an alliance between France and Russia, and a growing friendliness between Britain and France, and Germany feared that her rivals were combining to hem her in and put a stop to what she considered her natural development. Russia had fallen very low after the war with Japan, but was rapidly recovering both in wealth and armed strength. France was making strenuous efforts to increase her army, so that she should not be at a disadvantage as compared with the far greater population of Germany. Britain had no ambitions of conquest; her aim was the peaceful development of her Empire. But that was an oversea Empire, and she required a large navy; and the size of this navy seemed to Germany to be a menace to her future.
The result was that in the summer of 1914 the rulers of Germany had decided that some great effort must soon be made; they must put their land in such a position that for the future it would have no cause to dread the aggression, or even the rivalry, of other Powers. If they delayed too long they feared that the growing wealth of Russia and the increased military strength of France would make such an effort for ever impossible.
On June 28, 1914, the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Austrian throne, was murdered, along with his wife, in the little Bosnian town of Serajevo. Austria had long been jealous of the movement towards unity among the Slav peoples in the Balkans, with Serbia at their head, and she believed, or pretended to believe, that the murder had been connived at by the Serbian Government. Germany, for reasons of her own, was equally desirous to see the power of the Balkan states diminished. She had a grandiose design of extending her influence eastward through Constantinople to the Persian Gulf, with Turkey as her ally or her tool, and planting a German outpost on the flank of our Indian Empire; and a strong Serbian kingdom, or a union of Slav peoples, would effectually bar the way. With the approval of Germany, therefore, Austria sent an ultimatum to Serbia, demanding certain concessions which would have made Serbia no longer a sovereign state. Serbia, while willing to grant most of the demands, was compelled to refuse others, and Austria promptly declared war.
Russia now interfered in support of Serbia, and mobilized her armies on her southern frontiers. Every attempt was made by the statesmen of Western Europe, and notably by the British Foreign Secretary, Sir Edward Grey, to limit the quarrel and to persuade Austria to listen to reason. Germany, however, had no desire for a peaceful settlement. She induced Austria to refuse all mediation, and presently, after a peremptory request to the Tsar to demobilize, she declared war upon Russia. Russia and France were allies, and war with France followed naturally within twenty-four hours.
The position of Britain had become extremely difficult She had no formal alliance with France, but in her own interests she could not allow her nearest neighbour to be crushed, and the balance of power in Europe to be entirely changed. Britain had never seriously considered the possibility of a European war, and was extremely averse from interfering in a quarrel in which she had no direct concern. She might well have hesitated till it was too late to act with effect, or have blundered into some foolish compromise with Germany.
The situation was saved by Belgium. The German scheme of attack on France was based upon a sudden invasion from the north, and for this a march through Belgium was essential. The neutrality of Belgium had long before been guaranteed by all the great Powers, but Germany argued that her necessity must override the law of nations, and demanded a passage through Belgium. This was refused. The invasion of Belgium accordingly began on Sunday, the 2nd August, and this outrage determined the policy of the British Government and the British people.
On Monday, the 3rd August, Sir Edward Grey announced that the fleet and the army had been mobilized, and that Britain proposed to defend with the sword her treaty obligations to Belgium. That evening an ultimatum was sent to Germany demanding her immediate withdrawal from Belgium; next day we were at war with Germany. On the same afternoon the German Imperial Chancellor made a speech defending his violation of Belgian neutrality. "He who is threatened, as we are threatened, can have but the one thought—how he is to hack his way through." The German Government had believed to the last that Britain would remain neutral, and her entry into the conflict for a moment dashed their zeal for war. "The British change the whole situation," the Emperor told the United States Ambassador. "An obstinate nation! They will keep up the war. It cannot end soon."
Britain had no great military force to throw into the balance, such as the armies of France and Russia. Her small regular army was little more than a garrison for her Oversea Dominions, and her Territorial Force was intended for home defence. But Lord Haldane, when Secretary for War, had foreseen the possibility of a Continental struggle, and had prepared plans by which an Expeditionary Force of about 100,000 men could be placed on the Continent of Europe in a very short time. This force was, for its size, probably the most expert army in the world. It took its place on the left of the French line, and, though small in comparison with the mighty levy of France, it was fated to play a leading part in the first decisive battles.
Behind the regular army was our second line of defence, the Territorials, nominally 300,000 strong. But it was very certain that as soon as war was declared the whole manhood of Britain would be called upon, and that many hundreds of thousands of young men would be eager to serve. Lord Kitchener was appointed Secretary for War, and under his direction recruiting began. Before Christmas nearly two millions of our men were under arms.
But Britain’s main weapon was her navy, which was by far the strongest in the world. After that came her wealth and her great manufacturing capacity, by which she could supply the munitions of war required both for her own forces and for those of her allies. If her navy could dominate the seas, then her commerce would go on as before, while that of Germany would cease, and her troops and those of her allies could be moved about the world at her pleasure. "He who commands the sea," as Francis Bacon said long ago, "hath great freedom."
Germany was prepared for a war which she had always foreseen, and had the greater strength; but if the Allies did not suffer an early defeat, their strength was certain to grow with every month, while that of Germany must decline. But if the Allies were thus to grow in power they must be able to maintain free communications with the outer world and with one another, and for this they must rely on the supremacy of the British fleet.
In the very first days of war events happened which proved that the German Emperor was right in dreading the entry of Britain into the struggle. The British Empire overseas awoke to action like a strong man from slumber, and there began an epic of service which was to grow in power and majesty up to the last hour of the campaign. No man can read without emotion the tale of those early days in August, when from every quarter of the globe there poured in appeals for the right to share in Britain’s struggle.
The great free nations of the Empire—Canada, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand—prepared to raise and send troops, and the smallest Crown colonies made their contributions in money or supplies. India, whom Germany believed to be disloyal, at once agreed to send two infantry divisions and one cavalry brigade, and all the native rulers and princes placed their resources at the King-Emperor’s call. Almost every Indian chief offered personal service in the field.
This rally of the Empire aroused a sense of an immense new comradeship which stirred the least emotional. The British Commonwealth had revealed itself as that wonderful thing for which its makers had striven and prayed—a union based not upon laws and governors, but upon the deepest feelings of the human spirit. The effect of the muster was not less profound upon our ally across the Channel. No longer, as in 1870, did France stand alone. The German armies might be thundering at her gates, but the ends of the earth were hastening to her aid, and the avenger was drawing nigh.
*A BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF THE WAR.*
Germany had foreseen and prepared for just such a conflict as now began, and was able to put into the field in the West larger forces than those of France and Britain combined. These forces were also better trained and better supplied with transport, artillery, and machine-guns. Her plan was to defeat France and Britain in the first month, and then to turn her main armies against Russia, for she assumed that Russia would be slow to mobilize her gigantic numbers. But if the first attack on France should fail the situation would be changed, and Germany would be compelled to fight on two fronts at once, the East and the West.
If the conflict was protracted Germany would lose the advantage of numbers, for then the greater united manpower of the Allies could be trained for the field, and if the British navy continued to rule the seas those new armies could be supplied and moved at the Allies’ will. Moreover, though Germany could produce most of the necessaries of life and the apparatus of war within her own borders, yet the Allied control of the sea would cut her off from certain vital kinds of war material.
The Great War falls therefore into three stages. At the start Germany, with the advantage of surprise and long preparation, embarked on a war of movement in the hope of immediate victory. She failed in this, and the campaign then became a siege in which the Allies sat round her entrenched stronghold. That vast stronghold embraced half of Europe and part of Asia; it could produce most things that it needed, and carry on its normal life. Brilliant sallies were made, which more than once nearly dispersed the besiegers; but, nevertheless, for three and a half years the Teutonic Powers were as the garrison of a beleaguered city. Then came the short, last stage, when the outworks of the fortress crumbled, and the Allies pressed in and forced the garrison to surrender.
Germany began the war with Austria as her ally. Within three months she had been joined by Turkey, and by the end of the first year of war Bulgaria mustered on her side. The Allies at the start were France, Britain, Russia, Belgium, Serbia, and Japan; in May 1915 Italy joined them, and in August 1916 Rumania. Before the end Portugal and Greece, among the European Powers, were added; the United States of America joined in April 1917; and in the last year of the war there were altogether eleven Powers in Europe, Asia, and America on their side. The main battles were fought on the Continent of Europe, and the main belligerents, from start to finish, were the European nations. The accession of America, however, was vital for the Allied victory, as it counterbalanced the failure of Russia, which, after the revolution in March 1917, rapidly went to pieces and dropped out of the fighting line.
Before telling of any special incidents of the great struggle it is desirable to have before our minds a general bird’s-eye view of the whole war. Germany’s first plan of an immediate conquest was defeated by France and Britain at the First Battle of the Marne in September 1914. She made a second attempt upon the shores of the English Channel, which was foiled before Ypres in November of the same year. After that her policy was to stand on the defensive in the West and to aim at the destruction of Russia. In this, during 1915, she nearly succeeded. The Russian armies were driven out of Poland, but they established their line during the autumn, and Germany’s ambitious strategy had once more failed.
In 1916 the Allies were ready for a combined advance, Germany was aware of their policy, and tried to anticipate it by her great attack on Verdun in February of that year—a battle which was fiercely contested for months, and finally ebbed away about midsummer. By that time Austria’s attack on Italy had also failed and the Allied advance begun. The Russians won great successes in Galicia, and the British and French on the Somme dealt the German armies a blow from which they never really recovered. In Rumania, on the other hand, Germany had a temporary success; but by the close of 1916 it was clear to her commanders that unless some miracle happened the war would end with an Allied victory during the following year.
That miracle happened, in the form of the Russian revolution in the spring of 1917. Thereafter Germany was able to get rid of the war on her eastern frontier and to throw all her strength against the West. During that spring and summer she staved off the French and British attacks at Arras, at Ypres, and on the Aisne, and in the autumn of 1917 she was ready to begin her own offensive. Her first blow was directed against Italy, whom she drove back fifty miles from the Isonzo to the Piave, with immense losses. In March 1918 she struck her great blow in the West. With a large superiority in men and guns, she attacked the British at St. Quentin, and forced them to retreat almost to the gates of Amiens.
It was a success, but only a limited success, and with this last stroke her energy began to ebb. Foch was now Commander-in-Chief of the Allies, and with great skill he maintained a stubborn defensive till such time as he had gathered strength for a counter-attack. Meantime the new armies of America were arriving in France at the rate of 10,000 a day. In July Germany struck her last blow on the Marne in a frantic effort to reach Paris. That blow was likewise warded off, and three days later the Allied counter-offensive began.
Then in a series of great attacks all the prepared German defences were broken down. By the early days of October Turkey and Bulgaria had been defeated in the East, and the surrender of Austria followed before the end of the month. Finally, on November 11, 1918, Germany herself was forced to sue for an armistice in order to save her armies from destruction. An armistice was granted, but its terms involved an unconditional surrender to the will of the Allies.
The episodes contained in the following chapters have been chosen as examples of the achievements of Britain and her Oversea Dominions in the Great War. They are notable episodes, which stand out from the day-to-day routine of the fighting. They are exploits, each of which materially contributed to Germany’s defeat. But the qualities which they reveal in the men who shared in them were not confined to those men; they are typical qualities, and were possessed in no less degree by hundreds of thousands of men who fought in obscurity, but whose unrecorded service was equally the cause of victory. A war is won not only by the shining deeds of the few, but also by the faithfulness of the many, though it is the brilliant deeds which stand out most clearly in the world’s memory and become the symbols and memorials of all the unrecorded faithfulness.
Most of the chapters belong to the attacks during the time of siege warfare, for it was by those attacks that the heart was taken out of the enemy. But we must not pass over the marvellous story of how Germany was reduced to a state of beleaguerment, and why she did not succeed in her first plan and win in a war of movement. The reason of this was a great battle, in which France played the chief part, but in which the small British army had also an honourable share. Before we begin our record, then, let us look at the stand on the Marne which wrecked the first hope of a German victory in the war.
*THE TURN AT THE MARNE.*
Germany, as we have seen, began the war in the West with larger forces than those of France and Britain. She had also prepared definite plans of action, most of which she had managed to conceal from her opponents. General Joffre, the French Commander-in-Chief, was aware of her main intention—to outflank the French left wing by a drive through Belgium; but he did not guess how strong the enemy right wing would be, or how wide its wheel. His own plan was to strike first, and to attack the enemy’s left and centre in Lorraine and in the Ardennes, where he supposed the German front would be relatively weak.
John Buchan and Henry Newbolt's Days to Remember: The British Empire in the Great War (1922) opens with a conventional account of the war's causes—Germany's late imperial ambition—but the excerpts reveal a more striking pattern: the authors repeatedly dwell on moments of eerie quiet and deceptive calm. The Gallipoli evacuation, described in detail, is framed as a 'daring conspiracy' with nature, where 'the sea was still as a mill-pond' and transports moved 'in dead quiet, showing no lights.' This tension between the grand imperial narrative and the intimate, almost ghostly particulars of warfare recurs throughout the text.
Silence and Deception as Narrative Devices
The excerpts from the Gallipoli evacuation chapters are remarkable for their sustained focus on silence and concealment. The authors note that 'not a shot was fired' during the embarkation, and that the British kept up 'the daily pretence of bombardment' with only enough guns to deceive Turkish observers. The language is deliberately atmospheric: 'a light blue mist clothed all the plain of Suvla, and a haze shrouded the moon.' This is not merely reportage; it is a crafted set-piece that turns a retreat into a suspenseful, almost supernatural operation. The phrase 'Nature had joined the daring conspiracy' personifies the weather as an accomplice. Such passages stand in contrast to the more straightforward battle narratives elsewhere, suggesting that Buchan and Newbolt were as interested in the psychology of deception as in the clash of arms.
The Empire as a Collective Protagonist
The table of contents and chapter headings foreground the contributions of specific Dominion and colonial forces: 'The Canadians at the Second Battle of Ypres,' 'The South Africans at Marrières Wood,' 'The Australians at Mont St. Quentin.' This structure frames the war as a shared imperial endeavor, with each section highlighting a different national contingent. However, the excerpts do not explore internal tensions or divergent experiences; instead, the narrative voice remains uniformly British and authoritative. The Gallipoli chapters, for instance, refer to 'our men' and 'the British commanders,' subsuming the Australian and New Zealand forces under a single imperial identity. The effect is a deliberate, if partial, portrait of unity—one that glosses over the strategic failures of the campaign to emphasize the skill of the evacuation.
Contrasts Between Grand Strategy and Tactical Detail
The book's structure juxtaposes broad strategic overviews (Part I: 'The Causes of the War,' 'A Bird's-Eye View of the War') with highly specific battle accounts (Part II: 'The Worcesters at the First Battle of Ypres,' 'The Tanks at Cambrai'). The excerpts from the Gallipoli section show this contrast within a single episode: the authors provide precise logistical details—'the beaches at Suvla were 5 miles from the enemy,' 'some of our gun positions there were on dizzy heights'—while also invoking literary allusions, such as the 'land beyond the North Wind, which Elizabethan mariners believed in.' This blend of technical military writing and romantic imagery is characteristic of the book's dual ambition: to inform and to commemorate. The reader is given both the mechanics of the evacuation and its emotional resonance.
Readers approaching Days to Remember should attend to the shifts in register between the panoramic and the intimate. The book is not a dry staff history but a crafted narrative that uses silence, weather, and deception as dramatic elements. The Gallipoli chapters, in particular, reward close reading for their controlled, almost novelistic prose. The authors' decision to end the evacuation with the image of 'great heaps' of stores burning on the beaches—'blazing most fiercely near Suvla Point'—leaves a haunting final impression that lingers beyond the strategic summary.
There’s something haunting in that moonlit Gallipoli evacuation—the quiet precision of it stays with you. Reading Buchan and Newbolt’s grand narrative, I kept thinking how the vast war always came down to such small, human silences. That’s why From Dartmouth to the Dardanelles: A Midshipman's Log — Reading Notes felt like a whispered reply, a boy’s own steadiness amid the same dark water. It’s just a different kind of truth, held closer.
-
Brett Johnson - 1 month ago
{'rating': 3, 'text': "A well-illustrated volume that covers many aspects of the war, from the home front to the trenches. While it's clearly put together with care, the narrative is a bit disjointed, jumping between unrelated topics. Still, it serves as a decent introduction to the British Empire's involvement in the Great War."} -
Carlos Abbott - 3 weeks ago
{'rating': 2, 'text': "Regrettably, this book reads more like a propaganda piece than a historical account. It glorifies the war and overlooks many critical perspectives on the Empire's actions. The lack of depth and critical analysis is disappointing. I expect a more nuanced approach when discussing such a complex event."} -
Tracy Clifford Santana - 2 weeks ago
{'rating': 5, 'text': 'This is a moving and comprehensive tribute to the soldiers of the British Empire during World War I. The personal stories and photographs bring the era to life, making it feel both real and immediate. A beautifully crafted memorial that honors the sacrifices made a century ago. Highly recommended for history buffs and novices alike.'}
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.
Michael Lopez
4 weeks ago